<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for John Dehlin</title>
	<atom:link href="http://johndehlin.com/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://johndehlin.com</link>
	<description>Retired from blogging, for now.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:49:18 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on LDS Church Presence in Japan and France by Hans Lara</title>
		<link>http://johndehlin.com/?p=80&#038;cpage=1#comment-36899</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Lara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 19:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndehlin.com/blog/?p=80#comment-36899</guid>
		<description>Gwennaëlle 
I like your comment
I can recognize different political views in the wards in Europe. You are right about American style not matching the european one. At least not the catalonian or spanish one I am identified with.
Europe politics give our members a more open political diversity. Something that if applied in Utah could be very beneficial for our world wide Church
cheers</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gwennaëlle<br />
I like your comment<br />
I can recognize different political views in the wards in Europe. You are right about American style not matching the european one. At least not the catalonian or spanish one I am identified with.<br />
Europe politics give our members a more open political diversity. Something that if applied in Utah could be very beneficial for our world wide Church<br />
cheers</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LDS Church Presence in Japan and France by Gwennaëlle</title>
		<link>http://johndehlin.com/?p=80&#038;cpage=1#comment-36896</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwennaëlle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 20:54:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndehlin.com/blog/?p=80#comment-36896</guid>
		<description>Talking about France? Here I am. Ask a real French woman.
Ok let&#039;s sit down a minute and let&#039;s look into &quot;psycho-grammar&quot;. I know it is going to sound very odd but humor me for a minute if you don&#039;t mind.
In Fench there are three tenses: past, present and FUTURE. Making future an envisionable thing makes it scary because you just cannot know what future holds for you. 
In English (and German and both people speaking these languages share the same attitude in life) you have no future (without being punks!). But then you have to express something that has not happened or is not happening yet. So you found the trick: you go through the expression of &quot;will&quot; to speak about something that does not fit in the two categories I have mentionned.
And it makes a huge difference.
There is no possibility for something but to happen because it has not before and is not right now and yet it is linked to your will and there is no opposition to it.
French (since we&#039;re talking about us) have this possibility that something out of control is supposed to happen but could be stopped because it is in a sphere unknown yet.
Thus leading to a very different behavior. you are more bold and we are more cautious.

I just gave you one tiny example (the only one I really know and can talk about) of our our grammar and the words we use can shape our mind and way to react. But there is much more to the subject.

Now imagine (and you really don&#039;t have to. Just take a trip here, you&#039;re welcome any time in my home) American teenagers, full of hope, innocent, sometimes slightly brainwashed, coming in our environment and trying to apply American technics, based of the American mind that they don&#039;t even master in.

There you get the reason why the numbers are so low.
And there is worse to it.
Taken that the church is presented by people who are not trained really (I mean I&#039;d rather not mention the MTC because it is like a snake bitting its own tail) to do this job they can only appeal to people who will recognize themselves in how they teach more than what they teach and if you are following me yuo can quickly understand that the problem is that they can only mostly appeal to people who are already out cast in a way or another OR to extremly spiritual people who have been looking for the teachings of the church and who disregard the way they teach.

There is hope though.

We have a second/third and strong generation in the church.
I am talking about educated people unfortunately some false teachings have been carried over and are still holding hard in France and it takes much more strength to unroot it for their education makes it possible for them to justify things that are just false and unjustifiable.

And talking about the &quot;jean-marie Lepen&#039; thing I think it is a very partial vision of the church in France.
I see mainly socialists around me in the church. Even some union leaders.
It really depends where you are, what generation you are talking to and many more things.
Yet I see really no hard feelings concerning our political point of views. Yet I am saying this from what I see in my ward and my stake. It could be wrong in another ward I guess.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talking about France? Here I am. Ask a real French woman.<br />
Ok let&#8217;s sit down a minute and let&#8217;s look into &#8220;psycho-grammar&#8221;. I know it is going to sound very odd but humor me for a minute if you don&#8217;t mind.<br />
In Fench there are three tenses: past, present and FUTURE. Making future an envisionable thing makes it scary because you just cannot know what future holds for you.<br />
In English (and German and both people speaking these languages share the same attitude in life) you have no future (without being punks!). But then you have to express something that has not happened or is not happening yet. So you found the trick: you go through the expression of &#8220;will&#8221; to speak about something that does not fit in the two categories I have mentionned.<br />
And it makes a huge difference.<br />
There is no possibility for something but to happen because it has not before and is not right now and yet it is linked to your will and there is no opposition to it.<br />
French (since we&#8217;re talking about us) have this possibility that something out of control is supposed to happen but could be stopped because it is in a sphere unknown yet.<br />
Thus leading to a very different behavior. you are more bold and we are more cautious.</p>
<p>I just gave you one tiny example (the only one I really know and can talk about) of our our grammar and the words we use can shape our mind and way to react. But there is much more to the subject.</p>
<p>Now imagine (and you really don&#8217;t have to. Just take a trip here, you&#8217;re welcome any time in my home) American teenagers, full of hope, innocent, sometimes slightly brainwashed, coming in our environment and trying to apply American technics, based of the American mind that they don&#8217;t even master in.</p>
<p>There you get the reason why the numbers are so low.<br />
And there is worse to it.<br />
Taken that the church is presented by people who are not trained really (I mean I&#8217;d rather not mention the MTC because it is like a snake bitting its own tail) to do this job they can only appeal to people who will recognize themselves in how they teach more than what they teach and if you are following me yuo can quickly understand that the problem is that they can only mostly appeal to people who are already out cast in a way or another OR to extremly spiritual people who have been looking for the teachings of the church and who disregard the way they teach.</p>
<p>There is hope though.</p>
<p>We have a second/third and strong generation in the church.<br />
I am talking about educated people unfortunately some false teachings have been carried over and are still holding hard in France and it takes much more strength to unroot it for their education makes it possible for them to justify things that are just false and unjustifiable.</p>
<p>And talking about the &#8220;jean-marie Lepen&#8217; thing I think it is a very partial vision of the church in France.<br />
I see mainly socialists around me in the church. Even some union leaders.<br />
It really depends where you are, what generation you are talking to and many more things.<br />
Yet I see really no hard feelings concerning our political point of views. Yet I am saying this from what I see in my ward and my stake. It could be wrong in another ward I guess.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on LDS Church Presence in Japan and France by Hans Lara</title>
		<link>http://johndehlin.com/?p=80&#038;cpage=1#comment-36872</link>
		<dc:creator>Hans Lara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 00:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndehlin.com/blog/?p=80#comment-36872</guid>
		<description>Being a european mormon, I can say that the Church relies on baptisms from immigrants more than from own country population, at least i have witness that in Spain, Italy, Greece and other countries. France enjoys of a very secular government, and recently the president Nicolas Sarkozy spoke regarding some religious characterisitcs of some religions that dont have a place in the french republic as those beliefs diminish women and put them on a lower level than men. 
I wonder if contemplating the lower role that women have had in our church for so many decades, we will be contemplated as a tradition that does not guarantee equality, and consequently like other religions we are contemplated as a poor option for women to join.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a european mormon, I can say that the Church relies on baptisms from immigrants more than from own country population, at least i have witness that in Spain, Italy, Greece and other countries. France enjoys of a very secular government, and recently the president Nicolas Sarkozy spoke regarding some religious characterisitcs of some religions that dont have a place in the french republic as those beliefs diminish women and put them on a lower level than men.<br />
I wonder if contemplating the lower role that women have had in our church for so many decades, we will be contemplated as a tradition that does not guarantee equality, and consequently like other religions we are contemplated as a poor option for women to join.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My “Wicked” LDS Journey Part 8: “Wonderful” by Diane</title>
		<link>http://johndehlin.com/?p=67&#038;cpage=1#comment-36869</link>
		<dc:creator>Diane</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 23:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndehlin.com/blog/?p=67#comment-36869</guid>
		<description>I think this song, along with the entire musical, shows how easy it is to sway a group of people into believing that some people are evil and some are to be revered.  This is why the Bible or other Holy books like it are not to be fully believed.  They were written long ago by humans, mostly men, whom it seems their main focus was to keep woman in the backseat and subservient.  And it is true, if you read the lines:  

WIZARD
(spoken) Elphaba, where I’m from, we believe all sorts of
things that aren’t true. We call it - “history.”

It is also called religion.  Who knows what really happened.  All we really know about are solid proven facts, like dinosaurs existed, carbon dating is a true science and cannot be taken out of the equation just so religion can have its place.  

I think this song, as well as the entire musical&#039;s message is something for ALL relgious people to think about.  Mainly, who&#039;s to say who is or was Wicked, or if they really even existed.  It all comes from stories from a collaborated book.  Really great pieces of fiction, but fiction nonetheless.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this song, along with the entire musical, shows how easy it is to sway a group of people into believing that some people are evil and some are to be revered.  This is why the Bible or other Holy books like it are not to be fully believed.  They were written long ago by humans, mostly men, whom it seems their main focus was to keep woman in the backseat and subservient.  And it is true, if you read the lines:  </p>
<p>WIZARD<br />
(spoken) Elphaba, where I’m from, we believe all sorts of<br />
things that aren’t true. We call it &#8211; “history.”</p>
<p>It is also called religion.  Who knows what really happened.  All we really know about are solid proven facts, like dinosaurs existed, carbon dating is a true science and cannot be taken out of the equation just so religion can have its place.  </p>
<p>I think this song, as well as the entire musical&#8217;s message is something for ALL relgious people to think about.  Mainly, who&#8217;s to say who is or was Wicked, or if they really even existed.  It all comes from stories from a collaborated book.  Really great pieces of fiction, but fiction nonetheless.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oprah, Eckhart Tolle on Religion and Higher Consciousness by Jana</title>
		<link>http://johndehlin.com/?p=245&#038;cpage=1#comment-27374</link>
		<dc:creator>Jana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 19:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndehlin.com/?p=245#comment-27374</guid>
		<description>I felt a bit silly buying an Oprah book, but I think you&#039;re right about this.  Glad one of the persons (you) I have great respect for is, in a way, validating my interest in this particular Oprah effort ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I felt a bit silly buying an Oprah book, but I think you&#8217;re right about this.  Glad one of the persons (you) I have great respect for is, in a way, validating my interest in this particular Oprah effort <img src='http://johndehlin.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Oprah, Eckhart Tolle on Religion and Higher Consciousness by alexandra</title>
		<link>http://johndehlin.com/?p=245&#038;cpage=1#comment-23821</link>
		<dc:creator>alexandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 15:16:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndehlin.com/?p=245#comment-23821</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t be sheep!

My take on this book is that it has a very authoratative and arrogant passive agressive approach.
I heard all the big hype, wondering what in the world could this guy be saying that was so revolutionary ....  decided to but the book (against instincts), got home, read and read wondering when I was going to hear something new.  
Never happened!
 ... then I got to page # 260  p3 and I quote &quot;If you find this book incomprehensible or meaningless, it (awakening) has not yet happened to you.  If something within you responds to it, however, if you somehow recognize the truth in it, it means the process of awakening has begun.&quot;
my point precisely, completely arrogant.  To even suggest that someone hasn&#039;t yet awakened because they find his work meaningless falls in the category of false illusion &amp; insanity.
  Other &#039;spiritual teachers&#039;  say that they only hope that their words will help someone on their journey of discovery.
Dr. Wayne Dyer wrote spectacularly about the ego/false self in the 90&#039;s that far surpasses anything Tolle says.  
Dr. Dyers book is &#039;The sacred self&#039;. 
Why Oprah is so mesmerized by this book confounds the brain.  Many other spiritual scholars write circles around Tolle.
I&#039;m so dissappointed that I&#039;m sending by copy back to the publisher.
Alexandra</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t be sheep!</p>
<p>My take on this book is that it has a very authoratative and arrogant passive agressive approach.<br />
I heard all the big hype, wondering what in the world could this guy be saying that was so revolutionary &#8230;.  decided to but the book (against instincts), got home, read and read wondering when I was going to hear something new.<br />
Never happened!<br />
 &#8230; then I got to page # 260  p3 and I quote &#8220;If you find this book incomprehensible or meaningless, it (awakening) has not yet happened to you.  If something within you responds to it, however, if you somehow recognize the truth in it, it means the process of awakening has begun.&#8221;<br />
my point precisely, completely arrogant.  To even suggest that someone hasn&#8217;t yet awakened because they find his work meaningless falls in the category of false illusion &amp; insanity.<br />
  Other &#8217;spiritual teachers&#8217;  say that they only hope that their words will help someone on their journey of discovery.<br />
Dr. Wayne Dyer wrote spectacularly about the ego/false self in the 90&#8217;s that far surpasses anything Tolle says.<br />
Dr. Dyers book is &#8216;The sacred self&#8217;.<br />
Why Oprah is so mesmerized by this book confounds the brain.  Many other spiritual scholars write circles around Tolle.<br />
I&#8217;m so dissappointed that I&#8217;m sending by copy back to the publisher.<br />
Alexandra</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My “Wicked” LDS Journey Part 8: “Wonderful” by The work and the glory</title>
		<link>http://johndehlin.com/?p=67&#038;cpage=1#comment-23708</link>
		<dc:creator>The work and the glory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 19:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndehlin.com/blog/?p=67#comment-23708</guid>
		<description>Our approach is very simple- we detail the mandate Joseph was given from the Bible, then look at how well he did to fulfill that. We discuss Twelve Doctrines that his followers are known to believe in and compare those with the purpose of his mandate- The Book of Mormon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our approach is very simple- we detail the mandate Joseph was given from the Bible, then look at how well he did to fulfill that. We discuss Twelve Doctrines that his followers are known to believe in and compare those with the purpose of his mandate- The Book of Mormon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on My “Wicked” LDS Journey Part 4: “Popular” by The work and the glory</title>
		<link>http://johndehlin.com/?p=60&#038;cpage=1#comment-23707</link>
		<dc:creator>The work and the glory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Mar 2008 19:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndehlin.com/blog/?p=60#comment-23707</guid>
		<description>Still, the Mormons have spooked America since the church’ s creation. Joseph Smith was called a fraud when he founded the church in 1830, and despite its best efforts to inject itself into the American cultural mainstream, the church is still viewed with suspicion in some quarters. Polls show that a substantial number of Americans would not vote for a Mormon for president. Catholic and Protestant denominations alike have challenged the inclusion of the church in historic Christianity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Still, the Mormons have spooked America since the church’ s creation. Joseph Smith was called a fraud when he founded the church in 1830, and despite its best efforts to inject itself into the American cultural mainstream, the church is still viewed with suspicion in some quarters. Polls show that a substantial number of Americans would not vote for a Mormon for president. Catholic and Protestant denominations alike have challenged the inclusion of the church in historic Christianity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on #023: Mothers Who Know &amp; Julie B. Beck (Radiowest) by john</title>
		<link>http://johndehlin.com/?p=238&#038;cpage=1#comment-23656</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:20:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndehlin.com/?p=238#comment-23656</guid>
		<description>John I was glad to see that you signed on to &quot;What Woman Know&quot;.  For those not familiar here is the link.

http://www.whatwomenknow.org/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John I was glad to see that you signed on to &#8220;What Woman Know&#8221;.  For those not familiar here is the link.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.whatwomenknow.org/" rel="nofollow">http://www.whatwomenknow.org/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on #026: Moral Man and Immoral Society: Rediscovering Reinhold Niebuhr by john</title>
		<link>http://johndehlin.com/?p=241&#038;cpage=1#comment-23655</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Mar 2008 19:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://johndehlin.com/?p=241#comment-23655</guid>
		<description>I listened to this direct from her podcast.  It is great.  If you don&#039;t get her show on your local NPR station I would suggest subscribing.  She is really good at what she does.  Thanks for posting it John.  I went back and listened again.  Great episode.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I listened to this direct from her podcast.  It is great.  If you don&#8217;t get her show on your local NPR station I would suggest subscribing.  She is really good at what she does.  Thanks for posting it John.  I went back and listened again.  Great episode.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
